This page is for reviews of existing Good articles. A Good article review is conducted when a current status article no longer meets one of the standards listed in the GAN rules or has significantly changed from the state it was in at the time of gaining status. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe need updates or require their status removed.
How to nominate:
- Select a Good article that requires a review and refer to this guide on the article review process.
- Add {{GAreview}} at the top of the article you are creating a review for, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article review previously, the same page will be used.
- Members of Wookieepedia's Discord server can open a review with the following command, and JocastaBot will automatically add the review to this page: @JocastaBot create review for ArticleName
- Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary. A reason for opening the review must be provided.
- Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
- Purge the article to update the template.
- Other users can add additional issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
- On the review, all editors are able to add and address objections noted on the article's review. Afterward, one of several outcomes occurs:
- …all objections are satisfied.
- …all objections have remained unsatisfied for a period of thirty days, without a request for extension.
- …the article has exceeded or slipped under the Good article word count.
- …the article has changed significantly from its original state.
Closing stages:
- If all objections are addressed, AgriCorps review board members can start a vote to close the review after it has been open for a minimum of 48 hours. Three AgriCorps votes are required for an article to maintain its Good status.
- If objections have remained unsatisfied, the article has exceeded the word count, or the article has changed significantly from its original state, the AgriCorps review board can send the article to a probationary status. A consensus of at least three AgriCorps members is required for an article to retain its Good status or have it removed at the end of the probation.
- …articles that exceed or slip under the word count can have Good status removed.
- …articles marked for probation that have unsolved objections for over thirty days, with no request for extension or attempts made to fix, can have Good status removed.
- …articles that have changed significantly from their original state are reviewed by AgriCorps members. When determined that the article's current state is satisfactory, the review can be closed, and the article maintains its status.
Good article reviews
View recent changes for this page and its subpages
KT-10
Object
- Needs a pronouns/gender update.
- Would like to see a date added in the intro.
- Just to clarify, is the date directly citable to the source? Asking since the episode uses a converting method, so if that needs to be applied here then it should.
- Asking for clarity, are there no quotes at all that can be added?
- The biography should be section.
- 'and the treads on the bottom of her legs resembled women's footwear' is this statement something that is actually true in-universe? Lewisr (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- In the BTS, a full airdate should be provided. The reference books mentioned should have a release date and authors if applicable. George Lucas: The Creative Impulse should have context for what it is. Lewisr (talk) 01:11, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Bug One (droid)
Object
- Needs a pronouns update.
- The created by date in the infobox can be removed for redundancy and just move the reference to the 35 ABY date in the biography. But it will need fixing to note that the NERC dates the events of that story to the mentioned year.
- Would like to see a date in the intro.
- Gender on pronouns links should be removed.
- Biography has room for a subject relevant image. Lewisr (talk) 01:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Kodashi viper
- Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
- Date Requested: 01:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Object
- Some infobox-exclusive information, including the sentience; the others should be verified as well incase something else is missing.
- There's three instances of quote caption linking; it'd be ideal if these could be briefly contextualized in prose to eliminate this.
- 43.5 ABY needs a date ref.
- History section could use a subject-relevant image.—spookywillowwtalk 01:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Vontaige
Object
- Needs a gender/pronouns update.
- Fact tags need to be resolved.
- Per the talk page there's some question about if Vontiage has further appearances based off depiction or if the other scene that Vontaige supposedly is in within the comic is actually the character, that needs to be investigated as well.
- BTS needs to include a link to the issue and a full release date. Lewisr (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Telan Medon
Object
- The hair color being none seems to be redundant and not necessary to mention.
- I'm going to object on including that Telan was taller than Gar Stazi unless there is something to note for how tall Gar is, otherwise, it really doesn't add much.
- Could use a run through to get as many as links as possible, notice ones like sinkhole, waterworld missing.
- The date note needs to really indicate how this issue is in 138 ABY as well.
- Anything that can be included in a skills/abilities section?
- Missing an equipment section. Lewisr (talk) 18:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Pers'lya
Object
- Needs a gender/pronouns update.
- Body could use a subject relevant image.
- The body reads about Pers'lya's death like it could be at any point after, whereas the intro and infobox suggest it was in 11,987 BBY. Would like to see it consistent across all and if the date of death needs amending then should be done. Lewisr (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Unidentified stormtrooper commander (Tantive IV)
- Requested By: Hanzo Hasashi (talk)
- Date Requested: 20:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Object
- In light of edits and assertion of how the manga argument isn't conclusive. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Fird
Object
- Needs a pronouns/gender update.
- Skin color is infobox exclusive.
- Body has room for a subject relevant image.
- Missing an equipment section.
- BTS needs a slight tweak to modern standards, but to also include the release date for TEA, as well as its authors. Lewisr (talk) 03:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Unidentified clone trooper (Haurgab)
Object
- BBY dates used need a different source as the book doesn't use them.
- Hadde Base can be taken out of the death field.
- Needs a pronouns update.
- Body needs to directly state that the trooper is a human male, as well as Category:Males added.
- Body has room for a subject relevant image.
- Is there anything that can be added in a skills/abilities and/or an equipment section. Lewisr (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Laane
Object
- Death field should include the date and location in a single note, as per modern precedent.
- Needs a pronouns/gender update.
- Biography has room for an image.
- While some of the personality/traits section can be split off into an equipment section, there's some missing equipment to be noted like the clothing. Lewisr (talk) 06:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Villpu Nagg
Object
- Needs a pronouns/gender update.
- Would like to see the intro split into two.
- Is the Aqualish not a Ualaq?
- Missing an equipment section.
- BTS should mention the publisher. Lewisr (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Good status
Vote to strip Good status
Darth Wyyrlok (II)
Object
- Skin color is infobox exclusive.
- I have to ask if the double referencing that happens frequently is really necessary? If an alternative of using a written note is better then I would suggest doing that instead.
- Missing a personality/traits and equipment section.
- BTS needs a cleanup to modern standards, can cut the first direct mention part. But the two remaining issues need to have cited full release dates. Lewisr (talk) 05:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)