Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Wookieepedia
Advertisement
Register
Wookieepedia
In a galaxy far, far away....
202,462
pages
in: Semi-protected pages, Move protected pages, Wookieepedia Featured article nomination pages

Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

View source
Featured
article
nominations
Premium-FeaturedIcon

This page is for Featured article nominations. A Featured article is an article that is of complete quality and represents the best a Wookieepedia article can be. It is for fully fleshed out subjects that go beyond the limited content of Good and Comprehensive articles. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Featured status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding Inquisitorius review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after two weeks will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Featured article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic.
  13. …be at least 1000 words long. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.
  15. …be nominated by a user who has promoted at least one article to Good article status. Exceptions can be made for a Good article nomination that, due to objections post-nomination, has gone over the Good article word limit, so long as the number of words added during the Good article nomination process is 250 or fewer.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Featured status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{FAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Featured article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{FAnom|second}}).
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user (except for members of the Inquisitorius) shall be limited to four active Featured article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Featured article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the FAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful FA nominations before they can have three, and three successful FA nominations before they can have four.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

  1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either five Inquisitorius votes, four Inquisitorius and two user votes, or three Inquisitorius and four user votes.
  2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Featured article." As such, an Inquisitorius member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Featured articles page. Only members of the Inquisitorius are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by Inquisitorius vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Featured article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Teek

  • Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 04:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Restoring this Ewoks gem – originally written by AdmirableAckbar and re-featured by Menkooroo, though I've overhauled a lot of it
  • Word count at nomination time: 2077 words (198 introduction, 1478 body, 401 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Ewoks

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 15:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

spookly

Comments


Paodok'Draba'Takat Sap'De'Rekti Nik'Linke'Ti' Ki'Vef'Nik'NeSevef'Li'Kek

  • Nominated by: Mor9347 (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: SA'KALLA!!!!!
  • Word count at nomination time: 3006 words (277 introduction, 1892 body, 837 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Macaroni
  • I'd like to confirm that you checked every source that uses his full name to make sure there were no typos - any mistakes in spelling should be covered in the bts, for example, The Heroes of Rogue One.
  • I'd also like to confirm that you checked all sources listed at Battle of Scarif for potential sources/appearances.
  • "Rebel" should be decapitalized when not in a phrase like "Rebel Alliance."
  • The word "however" cannot be used to join two independent clauses the way "but" can (ie "He wanted to eat cookies, but there were none left" is correct; "He wanted to eat cookies, however there were none left" is not). Please fix this throughout the article - you can replace with "but" or start a new sentence ("He wanted to eat cookies. However, there were none left.")
  • Please give User:Asithol/Proper use of the comma a read as I'm seeing a lot of misused commas.
  • I'd imagine there's a relevant quote from Rebel Files to use for "Cry of rebellion," and there's probably one you can use for "Chaos on the beaches" as well.
  • I'm going to recommend against having images in consecutive paragraphs – it can make the article feel a little jumbled. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 18:10, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Please avoid contractions, eg "could not" should replace "couldn't".
  • Does Heroes of Rogue One explicitly give his birth year in BBY format?
  • "A cry of rebellion" has two full paragraphs that don't mention Pao, followed by two sentences in the next paragraph. I'd like you to condense all of that context for Scarif into 2-3 sentences.
    • I cut the first one down a little bit more.
  • Check your quote punctuation.
  • Image captions that are full sentences need periods, eg "Pao eating a sandwich" is fine, but "Pao eats a sandwich" would need a full stop.
  • For the Alien Archive quote, a quote within a quote gets single quotes ('') instead of "" JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:16, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Two more preliminary objections: is it really citable to RO itself that "before her meeting with the cabinet was even complete, Captain Cassian Andor..." ?
  • You've got a touch of present tense in the last sentence of the first paragraph of P+T. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 03:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Thrawn
spookly
  • Article is currently present in maintenance categories: Category:Topps usages with archived URLs not in Archive, Category:LEGOWebCite usages with the same archivedate value, Category:LEGOYouTube usages with the same archivedate value, which essentially means their archivedates need to be moved off the page and into the central ArchiveAccess repository for each template.
  • Seems like the first time Battle of Scarif is linked in the body content is down in the BTS—there surely is a way to move that further up. Also seems like there's a dupe link or two throughout.
  • It'd be appreciated if you could make an italics formatting run for the BTS. Most media, such as the Rogue One Visual Guide, does need to be italicized as a book title. Other things like TFA and the SW part of the SW YouTube channel also need this at first glance; so worth the overall check.
  • Pablo's rank as "Lore Advisor" is not citable to the article it's pointing to; and I'm also unsure if he held that specific title in 2016. The article describes him as working for the Story Group, so just saying "…Lucasfilm Story Group's Pablo Hidalgo…" instead would probably be more accurate, unless his titling at that point in time can be determined.
  • The Heroes of Rogue One is missing any/all contextual information as to what it is; in encyclopedia article cases, that'd be full release date, publisher, and to be formatted in " instead of italics.
  • It's generally optimal to avoid links in quote captions whenever reasonably feasible, unless good cause as to not, which means Neal Scanlan's should be moved into the BTS somewhere.
  • If Rogue One's trailer is being mentioned (first paragraph of the BTS); it needs its full release date + the avenue in which it was released (was it a Celebration trailer, a YT one, or shown somewhere else?) Also, if this is indeed the first picturing of Pao, there is no {{1stm}} next to the trailer in Sources to indicate this.
  • "… first story trailer…"—I'm also unsure this is accurate. Per Jalice Andit; other trailers of this film existed prior to the one listed here, so it would not be the first trailer, and the term 'story trailer' would also have to be additionally cited if its applicable. It may be better to simply say he appeared in a trailer without specifying. The Celebration one is—not exactly hard to find, but kinda out of the way, so I'd like to verify that that one has been checked for Pao as well.
  • All mentions of the visual guide need the note that most Rogue One SAs have to indicate that the book had the same release date as the film.
  • Also for BTS, any numbers under 100, per the MOS, need to be spelled out.
  • If Pao does appear in the novelization and junior novelization, these appearances must be marked as simultaneous with the film such as done here and appropriately mentioned in the BTS.—spookywillowwtalk 17:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
    • I believe I have addressed/fixed all objects! Mor9347 (talk) 22:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
      • Junior novelization and novelization aren't said to be released on the same day as the film in the BTS. While the Visual Guide does have it saying it came out on the same day, that is not sourceable to the reference book itself (most SAs use that one centralized RO media cite to condense reference usage).
        • Got those! Mor9347 (talk) 05:54, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
      • Copy-edit; did go ahead and fix then strike some of the above, but for future please note a few things: trailers are listed as {{1stm}} as opposed to {{1stp}}, headers must always be in == and not bolded, most media has specified italicization per the WP:MOS, so full italicizing films doesn't work, as the Episode part must be left not italicized, and then that curly ' are disallowed.—spookywillowwtalk 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
        • Thank you for tackling those for me and giving me future advice :) Mor9347 (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
  • Infobox sources Drabatan and male to reference 4, while the body has this to reference 1. It doesn't matter which it's made to be, but both need to match. The same applies for amber and gray in the infobox.
  • The PT uses "by 1 BBY"; but this is not sourceable to the reference book alone.
  • Gender needn't be in both the Biography and PT.
  • In the first sentence of the BTS, it's sourcing the film's release date to itself, which doesn't support itself.—spookywillowwtalk 19:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
    • I think I've gotten the rest of these now Mor9347 (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
      • It seems as if the species is now unsourced overall in the infobox. Amber and gray are still sourced to ref 4 in the infobox as noted above; in the PT, both amber and gray are cited to refs 2 and 18, respectively, and these will need to be consistent (doesn't matter which is picked).—spookywillowwtalk 20:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
        • sorry for all the mistakes with the sourcing, I think it's cleaned up now. Mor9347 (talk) 05:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Seems as if some of the refs need a formatting run; for instance, the one used for Pao's death links to its own page, capitalizes Death, and formats the film in short story form.
  • From some of the above, "…adaptations of the film which were released alongside the movie." was added regarding the adult and junior novelizations, but the "alongside the movie" cannot be sourced to either novel. This should instead use this article, which can also be used to source the film's release date upon first mention and the "released on the same day" bit for the visual guide, as ref minimization is done whenever possible.
  • Though most of the other OOU individuals in the BTS have context upon introduction, Jake Lunt Davies and Neal Scanlan don't seem to. While not required wholesale (as in, if none have it, that's fine), whenever some have it, to be consistent, all should have it.
  • Ultimate Star Wars, New Edition reference should be investigated to whether it can be sourced to Ultimate Star Wars, New Edition due to the standard of moving to newer iterations of the same publications where available due to generally considering them more accessible/accurate.—spookywillowwtalk 20:04, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
    • Done with these! Mor9347 (talk) 05:07, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
  • I'm going to heavily bet {{CelebrationTrailer}}—particularly given its just a Wook formatting template rather than a video link—cannot support the dates for which 2016 Celebration took place (a note: a larger trend of being more careful with checking if everything sourced to a reference indeed can be would be optimal).
  • Regarding Luggabeast being capitalized in the BTS; is this the case certainly, for Arnold's one? There seems to be a decent number of sources that say the species is generally presented decapitalized
  • It may be better to say "a luggabeast in…" rather than "the luggabeast in…"; makes it more evergreen, as that would have to be updated if more than one of that species ever gets confirmed for the film (or already may be).
  • If Rogue One is using Anthology Series for context, then likewise, TFA should be mentioned as sequel trilogy for consistency with film context. It should be double-checked that the 2015 year for TFA is present in that Insider article to be sure.
  • Rogue Visual Guide missing its author; even though mentioned lower; still needs to be first introduced alongside the book since it's higher up, before having the later stuff below.
  • Second paragraph: "Pao originated from a sketch—"—if this is the case (aka, the character having any sort of pre-origin than for RO), then the first sentence of the BTS is inaccurate, as the character—even if changes were made later to the design—was not entirely "created for" Rogue One. This could be changed to "first introduced" or "debuted" instead.
  • While I've done a bit of tweaking, I'm going to re-iterate (as per above objections) to check again for WP:MOS formatting errors; primarily regarding italics. RO Visual Guide, TFA, Rogue One, and Star Wars (just, the franchise name) each have one instance each of not being italicized. Also, the full film name of TFA is fine and good to have in its full form where its first linked; but in the several mentions past that, it should ideally be using the shortened form (just The Force Awakens). It does this sometimes, but it's pretty inconsistent, so should be brought to the same.
  • The Star Wars Encyclopedia bit; it should mention "first released in French on...…"; and, the English edition (released later) should be checked to as to whether the error was corrected. If not, even though we don't have firm dates for the English publication, it should be noted that the error got reprinted at some point afterward in the English edition.
  • Is Star Wars Go Rogue as a series confirmably needing to have " around it? Its page doesn't seem to indicate this atm.—spookywillowwtalk 02:53, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
    • I've checked the stuff that needed checking and addressed the errors! Mor9347 (talk) 12:34, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Assault on the Mako-Ta Space Docks definitely can't be flatcited to the story for its ABY date. And also, "Mako-Ta" or "space docks" as terms don't seem to be present in this story either; but, the entire section is cited to it.
  • Grammatically, the sentence "He often muttered oaths and curses in Drabatese, he understood Galactic Basic Standard however due to the structure of his jaw he struggled to pronounce words." needs to be fixed (by just reading through it, should see what I mean).
  • On Sa'Kalla, it's indicated that her name was taken up as a war cry by 1 BBY. But, this information isn't mentioned here until the PT. Ideally, it would be introduced in the biography higher up, as he must have learned of the incident/of her by that time to have used the term at Scarif.
  • Am seeing some linking of articles such as "a" "an" "the" being included in pipelinks; these should be moved outside of.
  • The "Development" BTS section is four paragraphs, which isn't optimal with modern standard. It may be advisable to move the 4th paragraph there about errors to be with the deleted and altered scenes (and tweaking that section title). Mainly, since chopped content and errors are sort of similar things, and the errors isn't so much development/milestones and then that section also happens to be only one paragraph, which isn't optimal.—spookywillowwtalk 05:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Done I believe! Mor9347 (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Lew
Wok
  • Edit: updated copyedit. Here's my copyedit for your review
  • In the intro, it would be nice to have a time period included in the bit about Pao leaving Pipada. Not sure if there's anything somewhat precise to date that but if not, just saying during the Imperial Era would suffice.
  • When you mention Pao becoming a corporal, is that a corporal within Rebel Alliance Special Forces? If so, methinks that would be good to include there.
  • For the Death Star plans part, you should contextualize the Death Star as a battle station or superweapon.
  • Jyn and K2 should be contextualized in the intro, either individually or you could also just contextualize Andor, Erso, and K2 all together as rebels.
  • The intro mentions the demolition skills as coming in handy at Scarif but never mentions how. I would either remove that or add in how they were useful in the fight.
  • In Early life, should the Crackdown really be linked where you mention the initial Imperial occupation? It seems to me like the Crackdown happened after the Empire had began their occupation.
  • Very minor but also in that section, where you say "to further expand the Imperial Military forces" - I think either "to further expand the Imperial Military" or "to further expand Imperial Military forces" would read cleaner. Thoughts?
  • In A cry of rebellion, "his first known mission" feels unnecessary to include. It's not required to acknowledge that we don't know of any prior missions. You can just say he went on the mission to Foerost without this note.
  • Just a general note, I think it would be best to refer to characters consistently with or without their rank instead of only sometimes. Wok142 (talk) 03:54, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
  • In the Battle of Scarif section, last paragraph, is it really accurate to say Bodhi is their only way off the planet? The ship itself yes, but not necessarily Bodhi himself, right?
  • Right after the above part, the next two sentences kind of start the exact same with "The troopers/Rogue One then." I would try to not use "then" both times there since it is a bit play-by-play.
  • Last sentence of this paragraph is a run-on and should be broken up into at least two sentences. I also think the last part of it reads a little awkward. It says Pao gets one explosive, plants it somewhere, but then mentions several more being planted elsewhere. Is Pao planting all those ones too? Saying he gets one explosive but then mentioning multiple being planted doesn't match.
  • Next section, "behind a crate behind Baze Malbus" feels like excessive detail when it could read smoother as either Pao taking cover behind a crate or near Baze Malbus. The latter part of that sentence where it focuses solely on Baze also seems like it could be cut since what weapon Baze is using doesn't really pertain to Pao.
  • Would it make sense to you to link Sa'Kalla (movement) to Pao yelling that as a war cry?
  • I'm guessing that "The Battle of Scarif was the first major victory for the Rebel Alliance." is not citable to A New Hope. Is there another source that states this?
  • Last sentence of Sacrifice not in vain, I think you should directly state who "some" refers to to be most clear. Also in that part, I would remove the "late" description since it feels redundant given that the following details describe how they all perished.
  • Zev should have direct context as a pilot or a rebel or something like that
  • It would be good to directly state that the reason Luke retired the Rogue One callsign was because of them. Currently the article only says "the next pilot should not go by Rogue One" and that it "was retired."
    • From here up has been addressed or has been forwarded to discord for further discussion. Mor9347 (talk) 21:56, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
  • In Remembered for decades, who recovered the files?
  • First sentence of the Equipment section is a bit of a run-on and should be split
  • In the last two lines of Equipment, you use also twice pretty close together. I would try to trim one of those and replace it with varying language.
  • In the bts, I would move the LSG contextualization of Hidalgo to the first mention of him. Same thing for Woodfine with the context of being the "external puppeteer."
  • Not sure what the "as confirmed by creature effects supervisor Neal Scanlan" bit is about. Is Scanlan confirming movements that Woodfire is making?
  • Couple things for the sentence "Pao's support team always arrived on set before anyone else according to Arnold, they mapped out the set and got Arnold used to the area before shooting his scenes, on set he was additionally guided by other actors." Firstly, I think it would read smoother if you moved "According to Arnold," to be the start of the sentence. Secondly, the "on set he was additionally guided by other actors" part sort of just feels tacked on. I'd say this detail would be better to include in the previous sentence where you mention how Kasey guided him through set.
  • You mention the support team as arriving an hour early and then later say that MacPherson arrived an hour earlier than anyone else. I'm assuming that this is not meant to say that MacPherson arrived two hours early, an hour before the rest of the team, who then arrived an hour early, but it does read like that potentially. This could be solved by either mentioning MacPherson earlier to then include her in the team that arrived an hour early, or by saying that MacPherson "also arrived early" or something like that to be clear that she was part of the same group of early arrivals.
  • In Edits and errors, what does "sniffing out a battle" mean? Is it like locating a fight?
  • Second sentence of this section could probably be split as well
  • In the part describing the plot of Going Rogue, there are some inconsistencies with the tense that should be remedied. Wok142 (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Objections for the New BTS:
    • When introducing Arnold, you say "lent/lend his talents" twice in the same sentence. I would opt for varying language there instead. Maybe you could say "worked on" when listing the Force Awakens characters?
    • "Due to a rewrite, Pao was pushed up" - What does this mean? Pushed up in the filming schedule? Just pushed up the priority list for Arnold?
    • "He detailed how he had fallen in love with the design and wanted to play around with the design of the large mouth." - is this referring to Arnold or Edwards? I would use their name here to avoid confusion
    • For the tongue part, instead of saying "not following through with," what about a word like "scrapping" or "abandoning"?
    • Context for Woodfine needed
    • "while the outside sounded like a light humming" - what about something like "while a light humming could still be heard from outside the head" ?
    • First sentence in last paragraph of Plight of Pao, who is "they" ? Just like the crew in general or what. Would be good to specify. Wok142 (talk) 17:11, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Mor
  • The BTS is a mess at the moment and will be dealt with and reformatted, any objections regarding the BTS will be handled in the reformatting and implemented once completed. Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 17:46, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
    • BTS Successfully reformatted, object away Mor9347 ForPipadaLogo-UserImage (Talk) 09:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)


Knol Ven'nari

  • Nominated by: ToRsO bOy (talk) 09:37, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Addressed the objections here
  • Word count at nomination time: 1025 words (298 introduction, 676 body, 51 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 Inqs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 18:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Nice work on restoring Lewisr (talk) 03:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 12:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
  4. CometSmudge (talk) 00:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

spookly
  • I don't think the comic alone can source the exact BBY placement of Knol's death—the comic's opening page only notes how many months after Geonosis it was. I'd recommend working back in the previously-present sourcing for that dating in a manually written note, as it'll need the chronology book's support (which is what had been meant by the combine fields objection, for a manual note).
    • Just to clarify, when you say "working back in the previously-present sourcing for that dating in a manually written note", you mean something like adding a 2nd source with an explanation? Similar to this as an example Jez Planchet?
      • In this edit, you removed the NEC cite used to tie the Queyta mission to 21.7. That has to be added back in, but in a manual note 'X must have died in X year, because NEC places the mission in which it occurred in [whatever BBY]."; not quite as complex as Jez's though.—spookywillowwtalk 18:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
        • Appreciate you explaining that in detail. Added back in. ToRsO bOy (talk) 17:01, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
          • Looks good; did a slight tweak to abide by the one-reference for death field precedent.—spookywillowwtalk 18:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Tied to above, but "21.7" needs to also be tucked somewhere into the body of the article, and ideally the intro as well, as it's infobox exclusive at the moment at that level of specific-ness. I do see that the overall year is pipelinked, but the number itself should be present as well.—spookywillowwtalk 04:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
    • Added "21.7" into the intro and body. ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Also just noticed, but the sentence "After this, the Separatists planned on using it against the clone troopers who served the Grand Army of the Republic." from the biography isn't referenced at the end.—spookywillowwtalk 22:15, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Updated the sentence so I can use the same sourcing. Thanks. ToRsO bOy (talk) 16:36, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Dani
  • Hair and eye color are infobox exclusive. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 03:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Sorry, what does this mean? I should add a mention of her hair and eye color somewhere in the article? ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
      • Yes, anything in the infobox linked/mentioned, should also be linked/mentioned in the body of the article. Make sure to use the same reference for both mentions. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 21:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
        • Gotcha. Added! ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
          • Not great to have a single sentence paragraph, go ahead and just combine it with the rest of the section. NBDani TeamFireballLogo-Collider(they/them)Yeager's Repairs 18:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Raddus

  • Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 00:21, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: This is it. The big one. The one we've all been waiting for.
  • Word count at nomination time: 4506 words (362 introduction, 3277 body, 867 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:42, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss
  • The page for Dawn of Rebellion states that Raddus is mentioned, but it is not mentioned on this page.
    • It was originally listed here, I checked it as extensively as I could but couldn't find a mention. I'll remove it from there.
  • A couple other FAs (Tala Durith and Haja Estree) list their cards from 2022 Topps 206 Star Wars, but this page does list its cards from the same set.
    • Based on a quick look those cards have unique images for those characters, though I could be wrong as to that being the reason. In any event, there's nothing unique here to include.
      • I'm not 100% sure of the precedent, but per a Discord discussion here, I think we list all physical Topps cards. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 18:19, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
        • As much as I entirely believe that it is unnecessary to include this card, added. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 17:00, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
          • I would support a change away from this, but Consistency is king. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 18:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
            • On the other hand, Nuance; as I explained here, I think that "Consistency" is the weakest argument for saying that all cards should be included. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 09:10, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
  • It appears as though the Raddus card part of the Topps Star Wars Living set was released in 2023, per tcdb, but you have it listed in sources as being released in 2019. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 00:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
    • I believe I had that originally but C4-DE changed it. I'll put it back. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 19:43, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • It seems like Mon Cala is duplicated in the born field; also, I think it'd be better if a ref note was made to have only one reference sourcing that field, since it's longstanding precedent.
    • Fixed. I've never felt this was a critical precedent but I don't feel strongly about it.
      • I think the duplication is still present, unless one of the Mon Cala bits is to mention a city (but in which case it'd need to be linked); the field currently has one Mon Cala on the top line and one below.—spookywillowwtalk 18:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
        • Oy, thought I had deleted that.
  • On most RO noms, the Junior Novel is also treated as a simult. appearance due to all of those coming out on the same day as the film; should likely be the same here.
    • Added.
  • This does seem to have popped into four hidden maintenance categories (probably as a result of the bot run); should be fixed and/or reverted.—spookywillowwtalk 02:00, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Hmm I can't find the weird parenthetical thing, and I'm gonna check with Cade to see if there's an efficient way to add all the Topps links before I do it manually. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 06:56, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Did them manually - I also did several searches for every parentheses in the article and I still can't find what the category is referring to. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 12:24, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Umbra (clone trooper)

  • Nominated by: Outer Shell Electrons (talk) 17:35, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Finally got around to nominating my first featured article! :D
  • Word count at nomination time: 2025 words (287 introduction, 899 body, 839 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

ThrawnChiss
Lew
  • (Review note) Welcome to the FAN, glad to see you on here! Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Be careful of casing, stormtrooper should be lowercase for example in this instance Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • I think we should include a date for the end of the Clone Wars Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • The date note concerning Greedo should be tweaked just a little since the Atlas doesn't directly date his death, more just the parts of the film that feature his death Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • At first mentions of the Empire I think we should use the full name instead of pipelinking Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Are the squad/convoy/group in anyway notable to make a page? Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Can you maybe rearrange the sentence where you introduce Senza so the slave use is changed to enslaved or similar. Something like 'While in the dungeon, Senza, a woman enslaved by Jabba,' might work Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
  • The BTS should note the app was his first identification and include the template in the apps section as well Lewisr (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Am

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 2277 words (352 introduction, 1496 body, 429 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions WP:Women

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

spookly

Comments

  • Cursory note that this and the other are listed here. It was added to said scope so long ago that I'm not sure if it holds up. Could, if it is accurate (fwiw no clue since I've not watched any Visions) add it as a scope here, but also curious on your opinion as to whether it should be listed there (again, haven't watched the scene present to know, but figured to ask since it'd be good if the scope stayed consistent with the FA's project templates).—spookywillowwtalk 01:39, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
    • I'm not familiar enough with biology to tell if its accurate that they're monozygotic as the reference says, but I think that reasoning only works if they're identical in every way except gender, which isn't the case since they have some other physical differences that wouldn't be caused by being trans (Eye color and slight hair color differences). They've both also been heavily genetically modified (Force-sensitive/Can survive in space) so changing their gender would probably be easy compared to that. Imo, probably not enough to keep them in the project scope. If it is decided to keep them though, then I'm fine with adding both articles to the project for consistency. CometSmudge (talk) 03:15, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
      • Conferred with a few others and the general agreement was that that esp due to the genetic modification, is a bit speculative even for scope, so nicked that out. Thanks for the insight.—spookywillowwtalk 00:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)


Karre

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:03, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 2570 words (323 introduction, 1669 body, 578 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Fall Guys

  • Nominated by: Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 08:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Second round
  • Word count at nomination time: 1167 words (204 introduction, 963 body, 0 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 04:02, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Object

Wizard in a speedo
  • A bit of context for characters and the films the content is based on would be nice, to be thorough. Even something as simple as "the characters Han Solo, Chewbacca, [...]" and "the 1977 and 1980 films Star Wars: Episode V The Empire Strikes Back and Star Wars: Episode VI Return of the Jedi [...]" or something like that, as well as context for which film's scenes are referenced.
  • How much of the carbon freezing chamber and Great Pit of Carkoon appeared? Could those be added to the Appearances list under Locations?
    • They made sequences inspired by the films, but the actual pit and chamber never appear in the game. Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 03:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
  • The stormtrooper costume description could be used as a quote for the Continuity section.
  • Is steel (and, by extension, beskar) canonically a type of metal? If so, it should be listed beneath the Metal bullet point in Appearances. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 06:09, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
    • Moved. Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 03:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
spookly
  • Technically, characters (upon their first linkage) like Han Solo, Boba Fett, Maul, Padmé Amidala and etc. need to have some sort of contextualization for who they are, whether occupation like bounty hunter or otherwise, similar to how it'd be done in an IU page.
  • "E3 2019" should be given some context—a convention, or something else? Was offhand unfamilar with the term.
    • Added. Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 18:26, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
  • The |work= field on several of the citation templates links Fall Guys; but these should be de-linked so as to not result in a self-link in this page's case.
  • Ideally, the second and third paragraphs of the Gameplay section would be merged, or, something else merged in a fashion that gets the section to three paragraphs total. Four isn't generally ideal if it can be avoided. Also—might any of the currency have an accompanying image of it that would suit? Bottom half of Gameplay has room for illustration if so.—spookywillowwtalk 05:54, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Comments

  • Previous nom for reference here. Bonzane10 Bonzane10-Sig 09:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)


Kamoradon sea dragon

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:57, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another animated creature nomination before all of my attention is stolen by Skeleton Crew extras
  • Word count at nomination time: 1452 words (230 introduction, 797 body, 425 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject The Clone Wars

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 19:09, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 00:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Object

Rsand 30
Wok
  • First sentence in second para of Biology is kind of a run-on. I think some of that information could be made into a new sentence. Even just moving the snout bit would help.
  • Date for the Galaxy of Creatures stuff should be added in both the intro and the body
    • I'm not really sure that we can use a book that doesn't feature the Kamoradon episode to say it takes place in proximity to the other episodes, especially since there's a city in the episode that looks and awful lot like Tipoca City pre-19 BBY destruction. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
      • Understood. I've removed that dating from the episode page. Wok142 (talk) 00:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  • In the bts, does the "portion" of Republic 50 refer to one of the 3 collections listed on the page for that comic? If so, that can be linked. Wok142 (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
    • No, the collections are omnibuses that Republic 50 was reprinted in. We don't have pages for the sections. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
  • One last thing, I believe it is common practice to spell out numbers over ninety-nine. There are a couple measurements in the Description that can be changed to be numerical. Wok142 (talk) 22:11, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Comments

Coruscant Eastern Spaceport

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Updates are fun. Retcon updates merging two major subjects? Less so
  • Word count at nomination time: 1468 words (214 introduction, 950 body, 304 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote Lewisr (talk) 19:10, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote Objection handled via Discord.—spookywillowwtalk 20:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
  3. Inqvote Wok142 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Object

Wok
  • Here is my copyedit, tried to make some things be a bit smoother in a few spots
    • Looks good to me, thanks! Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Separatist Crisis could use a date in the intro.
  • In Terminals and transit cars, I think the location of the desk in the sentence "Directly in front of the car's sliding doors was a circular desk" should be described relative to a permanent structure as opposed to a car. You could say something like "Directly in front of the arrival area" or something like that. Same thing for this part: "above the car doors was a sign in Aurebesh" - does that make sense?
  • More of a question but in Imperial Era and beyond, should "eastern spaceport" be capitalized or are you just referring to it descriptive-wise and not as a proper noun? Just want to be sure about this. Wok142 (talk) 08:55, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Was going with the description just for some variety, but can be changed if you'd prefer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:21, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
      • Leaving it as is will be fine. Just wanted to be 100% sure that it worked as intended. Wok142 (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Economist/Legends

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 20:32, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1302 words (249 introduction, 777 body, 276 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

  1. Inqvote —spookywillowwtalk 02:38, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
  2. Inqvote A FAN without an infobox? How common is that Lewisr (talk) 22:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Object

ThrawnChiss
  • In the intro, you start with in 10 ABY, then jump back to 3996 BBY, and go chronologically. I think it would flow better if you moved the sentance "After warfare in 10 ABY caused incalculable damage and population casualties on the New Republic capital planet Coruscant, economists made dire predictions about how much time the city-world would need to recover—prognoses that were revealed to have been too pessimistic a year later." to near the end of the intro. ThrawnChiss7 Mitth symbol Assembly Cupola 19:06, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
    • Sure, I could rearrange it to be strictly chronological (something that the article's body proper already is) but the reason why I prefer the current layout is it makes more sense content-wise - the first paragraph is about economists in general whereas the second paragraph focus on individual economists only. Imperators II(Talk) 19:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

Comments


Teroj Kee

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 01:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1818 words (251 introduction, 1462 body, 105 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:RESISTANCE

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Trymant system

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 04:01, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1467 words (138 introduction, 1025 body, 304 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:ASTWP:COMICSWP:NOVELS

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Reeta

  • Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 04:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1525 words (243 introduction, 1231 body, 51 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS WP:THR

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Baheeoo

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 19:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Rip GAN.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1123 words (156 introduction, 791 body, 176 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:COMICS

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms
Advertisement