This page is for reviews of existing Comprehensive articles. A Comprehensive article review is conducted when a current status article no longer meets one of the standards listed in the CAN rules or has significantly changed from the state it was in at the time of gaining status. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe need updates or require their status removed.
How to nominate:
- Select a Comprehensive article that requires a review and refer to this guide on the article review process.
- Add {{CAreview}} at the top of the article you are creating a review for, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article review previously, the same page will be used.
- Members of Wookieepedia's Discord server can open a review with the following command, and JocastaBot will automatically add the review to this page: @JocastaBot create review for ArticleName
- Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary. A reason for opening the review must be provided.
- Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
- Purge the article to update the template.
- Other users can add additional issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
- On the review, all editors are able to add and address objections noted on the article's review. Afterward, one of several outcomes occurs:
- …all objections are satisfied.
- …all objections have remained unsatisfied for a period of thirty days, without a request for extension.
- …the article has exceeded Comprehensive article word count.
- …the article has changed significantly from its original state.
Closing stages:
- If all objections are addressed, EduCorps review board members can start a vote to close the review after it has been open for a minimum of 48 hours. Three EduCorps votes are required for an article to maintain its Comprehensive status.
- If objections have remained unsatisfied, the article has exceeded the word count, or the article has changed significantly from its original state, the EduCorps review board can send the article to a probationary status. A consensus of at least three EduCorps members is required for an article to retain its Comprehensive status or have it removed at the end of the probation.
- …articles that exceed the word count can have Comprehensive status removed.
- …articles marked for probation that have unsolved objections for over thirty days, with no request for extension or attempts made to fix, can have Comprehensive status removed.
- …articles that have changed significantly from their original state are reviewed by EduCorps members. When determined that the article's current state is satisfactory, the review can be closed, and the article maintains its status.
Comprehensive article reviews
View recent changes for this page and its subpages
Special Operations Unit
- Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
- Date Requested: 19:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Object
- Outstanding merge tag since roughly mid 2023.—spookywillowwtalk 19:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Balith civil war
Object
- Some of the events listed in the infobox need to have a note for the relation in regards to being prev/concurrent/next per Forum:CT:Revisiting the prev, next and conc fields.
- The TCW episode doesn't identify Balith as a planet so that needs to be sourced to a different source.
- Since the war isn't mentioned in the cited source for its beginning date, it requires a note to explain, though the episode doesn't say the war started then so it should be changed "By 21 BBY" with the added explanation.
- BTS could use a modernization. Lewisr (talk) 01:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Hedge Mitchels
- Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
- Date Requested: 04:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Object
- Pronouns/gender update to be sorted; nominator was pinged awhile back as we were going to start tagging these year-start. We're very nearly upon the two year mark of implementation for these, so plenty of grace period time enough has passed for those still remaining as such.—spookywillowwtalk 04:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Unidentified Rebel officer (Ghost Base)
- Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
- Date Requested: 04:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Object
- Pronouns/gender update to be sorted, as we were going to start tagging these year-start. We're very nearly upon the two year mark of implementation for these, so plenty of grace period time enough has passed for those still remaining as such. We did manage to save most of them though.—spookywillowwtalk 04:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
YIN-762
- Requested By: —spookywillowwtalk
- Date Requested: 04:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Object
- Pronouns/gender update to be sorted, as we were going to start tagging these year-start; nominator was msged via talk page a few months ago. We're very nearly upon the two year mark of implementation for these, so plenty of grace period time enough has passed for those still remaining as such. We did manage to save most of them though.—spookywillowwtalk 04:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Comments
Vote to retain Comprehensive status
Vote to strip Comprehensive status
Damask Holdings
- Requested By: OOM 224 (he/him/they)
- Date Requested: 18:20, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Object
- Both Timelines and Nexus of Power need to be checked to streamline the dating. It's not necessary to say "established by 65 BBY" if the article later specifies that the company was involved in something in 65 BBY. "the Naboo people" also seems to be a bit ambiguous, and I think it's worth reading around the sources to see if maybe the Naboo government, the royal house/monarch, Palpatine, and/or the Senate were involved specifically. Complete Locations is a possible lead, and it's got multiple editions too. I believe the Theed Hangar is in the same complex as the refinery, and the hangar's article does mention that it was built under King Bon Tapalo.
- Given the importance of this to the whole Naboo Crisis and Episode I, I think a lot more context could also be given to how plasma mining affected Naboo's environment and people (which again I think Complete Locations goes into on multiple pages) and the Sith plot (i.e. Palpatine was a Sith Lord and he also controlled the Trade Federation, plus Damask Holdings was owned by Plagueis, but I'm not sure to what extent canon, or at least Nexus of Power which straddles the two continuities, goes into this).
- Again, based on my memory of Complete Locations, maybe some Techno Union or Sith context for Mustafar? Perhaps consider putting Naboo in the location field as well, given the company's involvement there (it's clearly a significant investment, even if we don't know if they had an office there).